Brinkley v. King
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
549 Pa. 241 (1997)
701 A.2d 176
Lisa A. BRINKLEY, Appellant,
v.
Richard E. KING, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued September 19, 1996.
Decided September 17, 1997.
Robert D. Clark, Wilmington, for Lisa A. Brinkley.
Phillip L. Clark, Jr., Ellwood City, for Richard E. King.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
One of the strongest presumptions in Pennsylvania law is that a child conceived or born in a marriage is a child of the marriage. In order to rebut the presumption it must be proved…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Nigro; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Newman.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.