Legal Opinion
Merman v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 15, 2010No. Civil Action No. 07-cv-3449 (NLH)(KMW)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Adriana Merman, alleges that defendants, the City of Camden (“City” or “Camden”), the City of Camden Police Department, and Buddy Camp,1 violated her constitutional and common law rights when she was physically injured and unlawfully detained by Camden police officers following a concert. In response to plaintiffs complaint, defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Subsequently, plaintiff has filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint.
*584For the reasons expressed below, and as set forth in the Court’s Oral Opinion issued on April 22, 2010,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Noble v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Usavage v. Port AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Susan Ryan v. napier/kleinArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ewing v. Cumberland CountyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.