Legal Opinion

Childs v. Tulin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1990No. S-3408, S-3427PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the superior court properly awarded attorney’s fees under Appellate Rule 508(e) and (g) to Charles and Helen Tulin who were named individually as employer-appellees in Donald Childs’ appeal from an adverse decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (“Board”). Such an award may be made only if the claimant’s position is “frivolous, unreasonable, or taken in bad faith.” Appellate Rule 508(g). The superior court found that Childs’ appeal as to the Tulins *1339was unreasonable because Childs abandoned any claim against them by failing to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hitt v. J. B. Coghill, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Childs v. Kalgin Island LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Whaley v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Witt v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Alvarez v. Ketchikan Gateway BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API