Legal Opinion
Newton v. Van Otterloo
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided January 11, 1991No. S89-610PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on three motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. All parties appear to agree that no genuine issue of material fact exists in this unusual case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., and the court has identified no material fact issues. It remains to determine which parties are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1).
I. History
The South Bend Lathe Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Grindstaff v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Coyne & Delany Co. v. SelmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Martin v. FeilenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.