Legal Opinion

Kilbourne v. McAllister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1936No. 26636PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

In an action prior to the present one the defendant in this ease sued one Mitchell and therein attached certain corporate stock which she alleged belonged to Mitchell, though it had been reissued to plaintiff and was listed in plaintiff’s name on the books of the corporation. In that action the present plaintiff filed a motion to discharge the attachment, on the ground that the stock was her property and not Mitchell’s, but the motion was not heard until after the trial of the main action, in which Mitchell prevailed, whereupon the attachment was perforce discharged. The stock had beeen held…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Leasure v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Wellington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Smith v. AutrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Stekoll v. PrevettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. McClanahan v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API