Legal Opinion
McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. Watts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1973No. 45283PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice:
McAlester Urban Renewal Authority [the Authority] commenced condemnation proceedings against appellees [owners] to acquire owners’ property for urban renewal purposes. Commissioners were appointed and fixed the value of the land at $11,250. Owners demanded a jury trial and the jury fixed the amount of their recovery at $19,000. The trial court entered judgment accordingly and further entered an order awarding attorney fees in the amount of $850 to owners pursuant to 11 O.S.1971 § 1663(f), The Authority appeals.
The Authority first contends the trial court erred in allowing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lower Nueces River Water Supply District v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Chicago, & Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Consolidated Gas Service Co. v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Stone v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 5 OF TULSA COUNTY v. TAYLORCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013