Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Barnett
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 17, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-827-AMPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. Now before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and plaintiffs Motion for Plaintiffs Institutional Medical Records. After being notified of the potentially dispositive nature of this motion, plaintiff filed responsive materials. Therefore, this matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs Motion for Plaintiffs Institutional Medical Records will…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Garcia Jay Wright v. George Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Dr. Berry Officer Larry DonnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chase v. PeayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Scott v. ClarkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
- Farmer v. KavanaghDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Lawrence v. Virginia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Doe v. Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Ctr. Comm'nDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.