Legal Opinion

Grubstein v. Urban Renewal Agency of City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 18, 1959PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

115 So.2d 745 (1959)

Phillip GRUBSTEIN, Appellant,

v.

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF CITY OF TAMPA, Florida, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Florida, and City of Tampa, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 18, 1959.

John A. Chilldon, Tampa, for appellant.

Cody Fowler, George B. Foss, Jr., and Fowler, White, Gillen, Yancey & Humkey, Tampa, for appellee Urban Renewal Agency of City of Tampa.

Ralph A. Marsicano, Neil C. McMullen and H. Vincent Thornton, Tampa, for appellee City of Tampa.

ROBERTS, Justice.

T…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. Town of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Baycol, Inc. v. Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API