Richman Bros. v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The primary question presented in this case is whether the evidence disclosed by the rec ord warrants any judgment against Richman Brothers Company. Exemption from liability was claimed upon the ground that the injury for which damages are sought, if the result of any negligence, was that of the servant of an independent contractor with whom Richman Brothers Company had contracted to do a definite work without reserving any control over the manner of the performance of the contract or'the doing of the work. Recovery was sought upon the theory that the facts presented bring the case within an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- McHarge v. M. M. Newcomer & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by28 opinions
- Albain v. Flower HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- American Transit Lines v. Ralph R. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Domany v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.