State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Defendant Sandoval appeals from a second offense conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI) in violation of NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(E) (Cum.Supp.1983), claiming that denial of his constitutional right to counsel required dismissal. In the Barreras case, the State appeals from an order dismissing second offense DWI charges based on denial of that defendant’s constitutional right to counsel. Because these two appeals involve an identical issue, we have consolidated them.
These cases present the issue of whether a person placed under custodial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BearlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Marez v. STATE, TAX. & REV. DEPT., MVDNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.