Islam v. Heinauer
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD SEEBORG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
In this immigration mandamus action, plaintiff Mohammed Sher Islam seeks an order compelling the government to adjudicate his Form 1-485 Application for adjustment of citizenship status. The government moves to dismiss, and both parties move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, both of defendants’ motions are denied. Further, because Islam has endured an unreasonable delay in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Khan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Mohsenzadeh v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Asmai v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Hosseini v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Abbassi v. GaudiosiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.