Legal Opinion
Mohsenzadeh v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 6, 2017No. Case No.: 3:14-cv-2715-L-RBBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISIMISS
Hon. M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), or alternatively for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff filed an opposition. Defendants did not reply. The matter is submitted on the briefs without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’, motion to dismiss is granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This action is dismissed without prejudice.
I. Background
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ramat v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Battineni v. JaddouDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Borzouei v. BitterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- El Centro Regional Medical Center v. BlinkenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Huan Feng, et al. v. Joseph B. Edlow, in his official capacity as Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.