State v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Lambert, 263 Or App 683, 328 P3d 824 (2014). We held that the trial court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress “all evidence discovered pursuant to the warrantless and unlawful ‘seizure’ of his vehicle.” Id. at 689. The trial court relied on the “administrative seizure” exception to the warrant requirement, but we concluded that the state had failed to demonstrate the applicability of that exception. Rather than reverse defendant’s convictions outright, however, we concluded that the proper disposition of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Lovaina-BurmudezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. Anderson-BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- State v. MeekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.