Legal Opinion

In re Clancy

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1996No. Nos. 94-BG-1549, 95-BG-378, 95-BG-729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals of Maryland placed respondent, Joseph P. Clancy, on inactive status by consent, respondent having acknowledged his inability to meet the demands of practice because of his own medical condition and that of a close family member.1 *494The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that this matter be treated as one warranting reciprocal discipline and that the functionally identical discipline — indefinite voluntary suspension with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness— should be imposed pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e) (suspension upon claim of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SamuelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re O'BrienDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re CornishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. WinklerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API