Legal Opinion

West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1993No. Nos. 1147 & 1148 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

West Penn Power Company (West Penn) and Armco Advanced Materials Corporation and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation (Industrials), two large industrial customers of West Penn, appeal an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC), recalculating West Penn’s avoided cost as being supplied power by Mon Valley Energy Company’s (Mon Valley) Shannopin plant rather than having to construct its own capacity.1 The PUC order was issued as a result of this *139court’s order in Armco Advanced Materials Corporation and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Omiridis v. ZHB, CITY OF CHESTERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Hopewell Cogeneration Ltd. Partnership v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API