Legal Opinion

Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

West Penn Power Company (West Penn) and Armeo Advanced Materials Corporation and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation (Indus-trials), two large industrial customers of West Penn, petition for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) recalculating the amount West Penn is to pay for power from a qualifying facility1 (QF) called the Shannopin project to be built by Mon Valley Energy Corporation (Mon Valley). West Penn and the Industrials contend the amount to be paid for this power is excessive because the PUC used improper factors in calculating the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. GPU Industrial Intervenors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API