Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 5, 1954No. 49799PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

This case is before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that plaintiff’s action is based on that character of maritime contracts of which, it is said, the United States District Courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

Plaintiff entered into charter parties with the defendant for the use of its tankers, the Sheldon Clark, the Sinclair Rubilene, the E. R. Kemp, the L. V. Stanford, the Joseph M. Cudahy, the Patrick J. Hurley, the Daniel Pierce, the E. W. Sinclair, the Sinclair Superflame, and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Thomason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. United Continental Tuna Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wessel, Duval & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Giovanni Aliotti and Sebastiano Aliotti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Continental Casualty Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Marine Coatings of Alabama, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API