Legal Opinion

Vincent v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 24, 1973No. 6620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the plaintiff voluntarily quit her job under the unemployment compensation statute (RSA 282:4 A (1) (Supp. 1972)) and regulations so as to be ineligible for benefits. A subsidiary issue is whether plaintiff was available for work in accordance with the requirements of RSA 282:3 C.

Prior to July 26, 1971, plaintiff had been employed on a full-time basis for twenty-four years as a coner and rewinder for the defendant Troy Mills, Inc. On that date she requested and was granted a leave of absence in order to attend to her husband who had suddenly been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowers v. American Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Employment Security Commission v. Vulcan Forging Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bowers v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Pregent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Lewis v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Neilsen v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Vincent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Hart v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API