Legal Opinion
Neilsen v. Department of Employment Security
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 1973No. 6651PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The key issue presented in this case is whether the plaintiff’s taking of an indefinite leave of absence to resolve marital problems made him ineligible for unemployment compensation under Department of Employment Security Regulation 21 when his employer notified him on his return two months later that his former job had been discontinued due to a lack of work. The plaintiff applied to the defendant department of employment security for unemployment compensation after receiving notice, but his claim was denied by both the certifying officer and the appellate board on the grounds that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- People ex rel. Davie v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- State v. Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of LaborLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Holte v. RondeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lewis v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Blue v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Fleury v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Iafolla Industries, Inc. v. Curran-Cossette Constuction Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Ciborowski v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.