Legal Opinion
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 25, 2010No. SC 18560PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 163 (AC 29854), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly interpret General Statutes § 21-80a (b) (1) as permitting a property owner to avoid the presumption of retaliatory eviction when its summary process action is based on resident conduct that is in violation of a material provision of the rental agreement?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012