Legal Opinion

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 25, 2010No. SC 18560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 163 (AC 29854), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly interpret General Statutes § 21-80a (b) (1) as permitting a property owner to avoid the presumption of retaliatory eviction when its summary process action is based on resident conduct that is in violation of a material provision of the rental agreement?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012