Legal Opinion

Walker v. Jackson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1929No. 5316PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

— Plaintiffs bring this action upon a grubstake contract to establish in them a two-thirds interest in the Ruth, Emerson and Essex lode mining claims situate in Beaver Mining District, Shoshone county, Idaho, claiming the right to possession thereof, subject to a lease of said mining claims to the defendant Deer Creek Mining Company. The amended complaint alleges that the plaintiffs’ interests are derived from the location of said mining claims in the name of Darius W. Jackson, now deceased, who located and perfected said claims under the express written and verbal agreement that they were to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Rice v. RigleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Morrow v. MatthewIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wilson v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Frost v. Alturas Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Krystal M. Kinghorn v. Kelly N. Clay and BRP, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. LordIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wyoming-Montana Development Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API