Legal Opinion

Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. Lord

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. 6801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

This action involves respective water rights, claimed by appellant and respondents in Black’s Creek, alias Ten-Mile Creek, conflicting as to priority both in time and amount.

The assignments of error challenge only the findings of fact; thus, issues of fact alone are the essence of the controversy.

The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings of fact and the judgment is therefore affirmed. (Evans v. Davidson, 58 Ida. 600, 77 Pac. (2d) 661; In re Randall’s Estate, 58 Ida. 143, 70 Pac. (2d) 389; Eaton v. McWilliams, 52 Ida. 145, 12 Pac. (2d) 259; Walker v. Jackson, 48…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McKissick v. Oregon Short Line Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Eastwood v. Standard Mines & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Patrick v. BisbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hulse v. Consolidated Quicksilver Mining Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Oregon Feeding Co. v. NolandIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API