Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. “A brief of evidence is essential to the validity of any motion for a new trial;” and this is true even though “the only ground of the motion . . insisted upon [does] not require a consideration of any of the evidence introduced on the trial.” Moxley v. Ga. Ry. &c. Co., 122 Ga. 493, 494 (50 S. E. 339); Mize v. Americus Mfg. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. '22); Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374, 376 (27 S. E. 706); Whitakm• v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (4-a), 140 (75 S. E. 254); Reed v. Wwrnock, 146 Ga. 483, 486 (91 S. E. 545); Garraux v. Ross, 150 Gd. 645, 648 (104 S. E. 907); Lucas v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Buchanan v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Durham v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Herb v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.