Legal Opinion

Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1938No. 12279PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. “A brief of evidence is essential to the validity of any motion for a new trial;” and this is true even though “the only ground of the motion . . insisted upon [does] not require a consideration of any of the evidence introduced on the trial.” Moxley v. Ga. Ry. &c. Co., 122 Ga. 493, 494 (50 S. E. 339); Mize v. Americus Mfg. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. '22); Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374, 376 (27 S. E. 706); Whitakm• v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (4-a), 140 (75 S. E. 254); Reed v. Wwrnock, 146 Ga. 483, 486 (91 S. E. 545); Garraux v. Ross, 150 Gd. 645, 648 (104 S. E. 907); Lucas v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Buchanan v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Durham v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Herb v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API