Newton v. Newton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Justice.
1. A suit for divorce based solely on the ground of desertion may be amended before the first verdict, by alleging adultery of the defendant, anterior to the suit. Zachary v. Zachary, 141 Ga. 404 (81 S. E. 120); Phinizy v. Phinizy, 154 Ga. 199 (114 S. E. 185). Compare Slaughter v. Slaughter, 190 Ga. 229 (9 S. E. 2d, 70). In such case the amendment should state with reasonable certainty the times and places of the alleged adulterous acts, or show why such allegations could not be made; otherwise it would be subject to objection for want of sufficient specification, but not…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Phinizy v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Miraglia v. BrysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Deen v. Baxley State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hargrett v. HargrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Morgan v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Harwell v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.