Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Nash
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 14, 1955No. 18836PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*344Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
The parties to this bill of exceptions argue, in their briefs in this court, primarily the question of whether or not the amendment of September, 1954, served to open the default judgment in the case, and whether the motion to open the default was sufficient. This argument overlooks the controlling question in the case. Code § 110-404 and the cases relating to the opening of a default have no application in a case where there has been a jury verdict and judgment entered thereon. See O’Connell Bros. v. Freeman, Keiler & Co., 118 Ga. 831 (45 S. E. 668), and cases there…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- New York Life Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- HOMASOTE COMPANY v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Adams v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Corr v. CorrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Durham v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Florida East Coast Properties, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.