Legal Opinion
State v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 16, 1990No. Nos. 85 Civ. 1887(LBS), 86 Civ. 8128(LBS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, District Judge.
After full briefing and oral argument, the Court adopts and approves the Order of Nov. 15, 1989.
So ordered.
KATHLEEN A. ROBERTS, United States Magistrate:
Presently before me is a motion by plaintiff for an order precluding disclosure by the State of certain documents claimed to be privileged. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
These two actions, brought pursuant to the federal antitrust laws and the New York Donnelly Act, N.Y.Gen.Bus.L. § 340 et seq., allege that defendants participated in a scheme to rig bids…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Martin v. Albany Business Journal, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1992
- R.C.O. Reforesting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- New York City Managerial Employee Ass'n v. DinkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- New York State Ass'n of Realtors, Inc. v. ShafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.