Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Veigel v. Hardstone Brick Co. of Little Falls, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1927No. 26,200PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from an order overruling the demurrer of relators to respondents’ return to an alternative writ of mandamus, the court below certifying the question presented to be important and doubtful.
The relators constitute the state commerce commission and respondents are the Hardstone Brick Company of Little Falls, a cor poration, and its officers. The facts stated in the petition for the writ are:
The respondent corporation registered with the commission a certain amount of its stock for sale on July 28, 1926, the sale of which was duly authorized to be made within the state, and of which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- In re MacNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. HooverDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1938
- Northwest Bancorporation v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934
- Peltier v. Ohio Radio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970