White v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Don’e Joe White (“Movant”) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 75.01 motion to re-open his prior post-conviction proceeding as well as the trial court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. 1
Movant raises two points on appeal. 2 However, we initially observe that Movant’s statement of facts violates Rule 84.04(c) in that it gives no comprehensible recitation of the facts relevant to the questions presented. Rule 84.04(c) sets out that “[t]he statement of facts shall be a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for determination…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Overall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Mo. Div. of Soc. Servs., Children's Div. v. B.S. (In re Interest of B.L.L.S.)Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Picerno v. Nichols-FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Pate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.