Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Coyne

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2000No. ED 76836PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY K. HOFF, Judge.

Patrick Coyne (Father) appeals from the judgment entered in the Motion to Modify filed by Kathleen Coyne (Mother) and Father’s Cross-Motion to Modify Prior Judgment of Dissolution. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rules 81.12 and 84.04.

Father appears in this appeal pro se. Even so, pro se appellants are held to the same procedural rules as attorneys and do not receive preferential treatment regarding compliance with appellate procedural rules. Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App. E.D.1999).

Father has failed to file an appropriate record on appeal.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Kent v. Charlie Chicken, II, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. HeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Maroney v. MaroneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Goudeaux v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Giles v. Riverside Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bastain v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Lanham v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange v. MedranoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API