Legal Opinion
Carolyn Newsome v. Donna Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 7, 1993No. 91-8917PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Senior Circuit Judge:
This is a Social Security case. Our holding in this case is limited to Social Security cases and to the narrow facts of this case. Eligibility for benefits were resolved in favor of the claimant, appellant Carolyn Newsome. New-some filed an application for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The district court determined that the application was time barred.
We find that the facts of this case are identical to those presented in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shalala v. Schae- fer., 1 decided after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Donald B. Jackson v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Walter Kadelski v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lia Yang v. Donna E. Shalala, Hhs, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kidd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Randall C. Scarborough, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.