Legal Opinion
Walter Kadelski v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1994No. 93-1891PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a procedural issue, the determination of which has significant substantive consequences: does a remand order to a federal administrative agency by a United States District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation of a magistrate judge, which constitutes a judgment, require that it be set forth in a separate document as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58? The district court held that its order need not be stated in a separate document and therefore denied as untimely the appellant’s application for attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michelle Dewalt v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Jackson v. DanbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- In Re Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation. Sheldon Danuff, Skat Capital Lp and Joel D. ZychickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Kidd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Foley v. BarnhartDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Jones v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.