In Re Appeal of Bender
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthbop, J.,
Under Section 1010, Article X, of The General Borough Act (1927, P. L. 519), appellants applied to the quarter sessions to have declared void and of no effect an ordinance of the Borough of Akron; the court sustained the appeal and entered an order that the ordinance “be and the same is hereby declared void and of no effect.” The decision below is not conclusive; nor is our jurisdiction on this appeal limited to a review of the regularity of the proceedings, as was formerly the rule on a certiorari: Davis v. Crafton Borough, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 37; Hand’s Case, 266 Pa.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Independence Party NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Hand's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Whitney v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Ligonier Valley Railroad v. Latrobe BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- In Re Annexation of a Portion of AbingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Dallas Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Pottstown BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Plum Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Tott v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.