Legal Opinion

Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Pottstown Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1948No. Appeal, 110PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

There are two motion picture theatres in the Borough of Pottstown, one of which is Strand Theatre owned and operated by the appellee, Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. On December 30, 1946, the borough enacted an ordinance imposing a so-called “annual license fee” on a number of “enumerated amusements, devices, busi nesses, entertainments, or public performances”, on the authority =of Article XII, § 1202, cl. XXVI of The General Borough Act of May 4, 1927, P. L. 519, as amended, 53. PS § 13338. The ordinance purported to impose a license, fee ou motion picture, theatres, measured…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flynn v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. American Baseball Club v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Kittanning Borough v. American Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Mahanoy City Borough v. HerskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. In Re Appeal of BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Palumbo AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Dallas Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Streyle v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API