Legal Opinion

Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1949No. 1; Appeals, 60 and 61PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, j.,

By an ordinance adopted on February 20, 1948 the Borough of Irwin annexed adjacent land in North Huntingdon Township. The township and its school district filed a complaint alleging that the ordinance was void for reasons stated. The court below, one judge dissenting, sustained the complaint, and declared the ordinance “illegal and void and the proposed annexation . . . ill-advised and improper.” The borough and the school district of the borough appealed.

Annexation to a borough of adjacent territory situate in a second class township upon the petition of free- . holders to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Garrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. First Congressional District ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. McQuiddy v. McQuiddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bristol Borough v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Dallas Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Palmer Township Annexation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Whitford Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API