Legal Opinion

Plum Township Annexation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 134PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an annexation proceeding wherein a borough by ordinance annexed an adjacent portion of a second class township pursuant to a petition requesting the annexation signed by a majority in number of all the freeholders of the annexed territory. Sections 425 and 426 of. “The General Borough Act” of May 4, 1927, P. L. 519, as amended and recodified by the Act of July 10, 1947, P. L. 1621, 53 P.S. 12461, 12462. Section 1010 of the Borough Code, as amended, 53 P.S. 12900, provides: “Complaint as to the legality of any ordinance or resolution may be made to the court of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Spankard's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Delaware County National Bank v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boyle AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Trojan Technologies, Inc. v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Greer v. Metropolitan HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Wynnewood Civic Ass'n v. Lower Merion TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Trojan Technologies, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API