Legal Opinion
Azcao Carrillo v. Dandan, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0671PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiffs in this matter, Hugo A. Azcano Carrillo and Saul Molina Chaviva (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), allege that the defendants, Dandan, Inc., George Dan-dan, and Tony Kayal (collectively, “the defendants”), violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1), the District of Columbia Minimum Wage Act (“DCMWA”), D.C. Code. § 32-1001 et seq., and the District of Columbia Payment and Collection of Wages Act (“DCPCWA”), D.C. Code § 32-1301 et seq., by failing to abide by the overtime requirements set out…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lliguichuzhca v. Cinema 60, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Ana Melgar v. OK FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Kraus v. Pa Fit II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Stainbrook v. Minnesota Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Sarceno v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sarceno v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.