Legal Opinion
Sarceno v. Choi
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1271PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The five plaintiffs in this action, Luis Sarceno, Rudy Godoy, Miguel Angel Irahe-ta, Omar Vaszuez, and Eber Estrada Flores (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), filed suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the District of Columbia Minimum Wage Act (“DCMWA”), D.C.Code § 32-1001 et seq., seeking “damages and other relief because Defendants failed to pay [the plaintiffs] minimum wages and/or overtime wages.” Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1. They allege that they worked for the defendants, Kwan S. Choi, Hwan…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Kraus v. Pa Fit II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Sarceno v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hernandez v. StringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Abrego v. Yu Lin, Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.