Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Ramos

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1997No. 2691PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge:

This action arises out of a fall that Karen Elmore asserts was caused by Tony and Helen Ramoses’ Black Labrador Retriever, a large domestic animal. The trial court granted the Ramoses’ directed verdict motion. The question on appeal is whether a victim may recover under S.C.Code Ann. § 47-3-110 (1987) for injuries caused by a dog’s jumping on the victim. We reverse and remand. 1

STANDARD OF REVIEW

In ruling on a motion for directed verdict, the trial court must view the evidence and all inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollins Ex Rel. Hollins v. Richland County School District OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Mitchell v. HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Wortman v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Mungo v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Davenport v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. HackettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Sherman v. W & B ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Padgett v. MercadoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API