Elmore v. Ramos
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, Judge:
This action arises out of a fall that Karen Elmore asserts was caused by Tony and Helen Ramoses’ Black Labrador Retriever, a large domestic animal. The trial court granted the Ramoses’ directed verdict motion. The question on appeal is whether a victim may recover under S.C.Code Ann. § 47-3-110 (1987) for injuries caused by a dog’s jumping on the victim. We reverse and remand. 1
STANDARD OF REVIEW
In ruling on a motion for directed verdict, the trial court must view the evidence and all inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hollins Ex Rel. Hollins v. Richland County School District OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Mitchell v. HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Wortman v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Mungo v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Davenport v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nesbitt v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. HackettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Sherman v. W & B ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Padgett v. MercadoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000