Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Holler
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 5, 1993No. 23831PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
Addie Mitchell (Mitchell) appeals from an order dismissing her legal malpractice action as barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.
I. FACTS
Mitchell was indicted for murder, burglary, and assault and battery with intent to kill after she allegedly broke into a pri*408vate residence of August 9, 1981 and opened fire, killing her husband and wounding his paramour. In 1982, she retained J. Edward Holler (Holler) to represent her. Mitchell was incarcerated during her trial, which began on January 4, 1983. On January 10, 1983, a jury found Mitchell guilty of all charges…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- First Baptist Church of Mauldin v. City of MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Berry v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Jason T. Myers v. Thomas D. Maxson Amy L. Hutchison Bruce W. Graham and Trueblood & Graham (In their Official and Individual Capacities) (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.