Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 1998No. 2789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, Judge:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a charge against respondent for driving under suspension. We reverse and remand.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 3, 1994, respondent’s driver’s license was suspended by the South Carolina Department of Public Safety pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 56-9-610 (1991) for failure to provide an SR-22 certificate of insurance. Notice of the suspension was mailed to respondent pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 56-1-350 and § 56-1-360 (Supp.1996).

On July 29, 1996, respondent was arrested in Newberry for driving under a suspended license. Respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Comcar Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Elmore v. RamosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HackettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. TaubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. City of Easley v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API