County of Fresno v. State of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
—We granted review in this proceeding to decide whether section 17556, subdivision (d), of the Government Code (section 17556(d)) is facially valid under article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution (article XIII B, section 6).
Article XIII B, section 6, provides: “Whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the state shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service, except that the Legislature may, but need…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- County of Placer v. CorinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Lucia Mar Unified School District v. HonigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by39 opinions
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- County of Sonoma v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of San Jose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.