Legal Opinion

Patrick Hayden v. Greensburg Community School Co

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 24, 2014No. 13-1757PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

On behalf of their son, A.H., Patrick and Melissa Hayden challenge a policy which requires boys playing interscholastic basketball at the public high school in Greens-burg, Indiana, to keep their hair cut short. The Haydens make two principal arguments: (1) the hair-length policy arbitrarily intrudes upon their son’s liberty interest in choosing his own hair length, and thus violates his right to substantive due process, and (2) because the policy applies only to boys and not girls wishing to play basketball, the policy constitutes sex discrimination. The district court…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Whitaker ex rel. Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1 Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Silva v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Vill. of Schaumburg, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Marybeth Lauderdale v. Illinois Department of Human SCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. St. Joan Antida High School In v. Milwaukee Public School DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API