Burgin by and Through Akers v. Tolle
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Shannon Burgin (Bur-gin) through her mother Mary Akers (Ak-ers) appeals a summary judgment in favor of James and Marlene Tolle (Tolle) in an action to recover damages sustained from a dog bite.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Burgin presents two issues for our review. Restated they are,
1. whether the trial court erred in finding on summary judgment the dog had no vicious propensities;
2. whether the trial court erred by failing to apply the city of Jeffersonville's animal ordinance.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ing party are: On September 4, 1981,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sidle v. MajorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anthony H. Dye v. William B. Wargo, Jr., K-9 Named Frei, and City of Elkhart, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- McCrory Corp. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- American Family Mutual Insuran v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Ross v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Plesha v. Edmonds Ex Rel. EdmondsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.