Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunter v. Omaha Motion Picture Exhibitors Ass'n

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1941No. 30189PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

On June 26, 1937, a temporary injunction was granted by this court enjoining the defendants herein, and others, “from in any way or manner carrying on, promoting or conducting or permitting or allowing or suffering within their places of business or in connection with their operation of Omaha motion pictures, the scheme, plan and system commonly referred to as ‘Bank Night’ now being carried on and conducted by defendants in connection with their operation of motion picture theatres in Omaha, Douglas county, Nebraska.” On June 10, 1940, a suggestion of contempt was filed by W. W. Wenstrand,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. EamesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baedaro v. CaldwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Draper v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Line v. GrantNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API