State v. Broden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant’s demurrer to an information charging him with a violation of L. 1927, p. 228, c. 149, 1 Mason, 1927, §§ 5705-1 to 5705-23, inclusive, the basic science act, was overruled with a certificate that the question raised, the constitutionality of the law, was important and doubtful.
No other parts of the constitution are invoked against the statute than §§33 and 34 of art. 4. It is difficult to see in these constitutional prohibitions anything intended to touch said c. 149. The law deals with a subject which concededly is within legislative regulation and control by virtue of the police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Carroll v. Greenwich Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Independent School District No. 197 v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Ellestad v. SwayzeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.