United States v. Senior
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Chief Judge:
Appellant has assigned two errors summarily. Otherwise, without admitting that the findings and sentence are correct in fact and law, Appellant submitted the case on its merits, praying for disapproval. The errors assigned are: that this Court lacks authority to affirm the findings and sentence because its “civilian” judges were appointed in violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution and that the presence of collateral duty judges upon this Court denies Appellant due process of law. These assignments have been decided contrary to the Appellant’s position in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. KincheloeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Unted States v. PriveU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. KovacU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WebsterU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. HillU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. TrujilloU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993