Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 18, 1995No. CGCM 0079; Docket No. 1026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. He pled guilty to two offenses, larceny of a box of condoms of a value of about $6.00 and wrongful appropriation of a pair of binoculars of a value of about $250, both in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921. Consistent with his guilty plea, he was convicted of the condom larceny. He was also convicted of larceny of the binoculars rather than wrongful appropriation, after evidence was presented upon his pleading not guilty to that larceny.

He pled not guilty to all the remaining alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. LamelaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. WashingtonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. States v. HaireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API