Legal Opinion
Ward v. Caulk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1981No. 79-3640PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff sued various county defendants on the basis of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 2000e-5(d), and the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The district court dismissed the statutory counts under the relevant statutes of limitations. It dismissed the constitutional claims because plaintiff could invoke federal statutory remedies against the state defendants. Ward appeals. We affirm the judgment.
I
Plaintiff Gregory Ward was employed by the County of San Diego Human Care Services Program. On May 5,1975, his superior, Robert Caulk,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Steven OUBICHON, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- James L. McCune v. The City of Grand Rapids, a Municipal Corporation Francis Pierce Gerald Steele John Doe and Richard RoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Azul-Pacifico, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, Azul-Pacifico, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Delgado Rodríguez v. Nazario de FerrerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.