National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge:
Appellant National Advertising Company commenced this action in April 1989 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that a 1983 ordinance adopted by the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, restricting off-premise outdoor advertising signs, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments and also resulted in a taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The district court found that National’s suit was barred by North Carolina’s three-year limitations period set forth in G.S.N.C. § 1-52(2). On appeal, National contends that it suffered no…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Larry Jerome Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.N. Barker, Individually and as a City Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Eric DePaola v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.