Legal Opinion
Robertson's Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 23, 1993No. LD-91-008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
On October 1,1991, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition for public censure and sanctions against Attorney Bernard J. Robertson. See Sup. Ct. R. 37(13). We referred the petition and answer to a Referee (Dunn, J.). Following two and a half days of evidentiary hearings, the referee found that Robertson had violated Rules of Professional *114Conduct (Rules) 4.4 and 8.4, but dismissed the petition insofar as it charged a violation of Rule 3.1. Neither Robertson nor the committee accepted the referee’s decision, and the matter is now before this court on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Wehringer's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Otis' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Daniel Barry v. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Sheridan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. R. Alex RAINES, 36610Supreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- Appeal of HoppockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025